In his work the order of discourse, Foucault examines the issue of disqualification in several respects, such as bringing clear and illustrative example implemented a ban against the fools of their discorsi.Bene is not difficult to try to bring out similarities and to comparisons with science fiction and political fiction scenarios imagined by multiple authors (R. Bradbury, George Orwell), over the last century of the past and millennio.Attualizzandoli dell'Autointerdizione trying to describe the phenomenon, namely the condition of discomfort in is heading a large proportion of the population, led by messages increasingly geared toward obscurantism of mente.Provo to explain better, when it excludes " Pleasure Text " 1 to watch television very much in decline in quality, vacuous, where strangers do anything for their ten minutes of popularity, when we are informed in an incorrect way and rarely fair to average for most subservient to a master, when we are inundated with insults shouted as if to take verità.Quando tone of our politicians are more and more often in television talk show to talk about everything and less and less often in the classrooms to talk about politics, perhaps with maiuscola.Quando we are guided by these people who have forgotten, if ever they were aware of the most basic "rules" of the policy conditions, which we could relate to poiesis understood as producing something good for the citizens to practice seen as giving public image of himself, which should always be above any suspicion and speculation or episteme as knowledge that should have values \u200b\u200band laws on the functioning of stato.Secondo surveys and statistical analysis in our country the freedom of the press does not enjoy good health, it would seem a paradox where there is democracy but it is not, because there is only violent censorship imposed by force by dictatorial regimes, but also, and this is the case of a thin mild complaint, which is not to tell all the facts, or adulterating or manipulating it , Insinuate doubts and suspicions and slander opponents, discrediting people, above all, discrediting the institutions underlying the existence and functioning of civil life and democratica.E ' ceased to exist as a principle governing the control of speech production 2 also wrote, and was therefore less able to distinguish the true from falso.E 'failed the speech made by those in law 3 ;' s authority, it was believed that a statement by detenesse ' author of his own scientific value 4. We are living in an era where there is more particular, urgent and essential to improve the living conditions of people solving real problems, but it is important to let credere.Si is reckoned to spend more than six billion euro for the construction of a Pharaonic as daring feat of engineering to connect two deserts, it is true that part of project much bigger and international in scope, but it is true that in a region there is almost permanently drought emergency, while in water it is far too much and water emergency in the sense of landslides and mudslides quant ' altro.Bene was estimated at a cost of four billion euro would be safe throughout the country, by advancing a couple of billion euro to be invested for example in construction popolare.Però convince us that all that is necessary and decisive for most of the problems now so atavistic perseguitano.Allo current state of affairs we can hope for in a single medium: the Internet, we think of how young people are using it and not Iranian and Chinese , constantly monitored and hard repressi.Auspicandone widespread dissemination and a more massive use in a state of "censorship" or autointerdizione constructive, but not by big powers, but by the most rigid censors who are our thoughts and our ideas.
1R.Barthes, The pleasure of the text.
2M.Foucault, The order of discourse.
3MFoucault, The order of discourse.
4M.Foucault, The order of discourse.
