Phlebitiis In The Thigh

Key points of "The pleasure of the text"

Barthes, in "The pleasure of the text," says the two notions of pleasure and enjoyment out of context Lacan (for a movement from conscious to unconscious) and proittandole to a universe of discourse that belongs to the area of \u200b\u200bNietzsche and Sade.
It is stated in the "Pleasure of the text ":" The writer's pleasure (and his reader) accepts the letter, give up use has the right and power to say it: the letter is his pleasure, he is obsessed. The writer of enjoyment (and his reader) starts the text sustainable, the text impossible: you can not talk "about" such a text, you can only speak "in" it, in its own way, get into a desperate plagiarism, hysterically affirm the void of enjoyment. "
Barthes also makes the difference between the text of pleasure and enjoyment of the text:" text of pleasure: the one that meets, gives euphoria, what is the culture, tied to a comfortable practice of literature. Text of enjoyment: the one that puts in a state of loss, that that discomfort (perhaps ad nauseam), shakes the assize historical, cultural, psychological, the reader, the consistency of his tastes, his values \u200b\u200band his memories, puts a strain on his relationship with language. "
Opposition radical would be: the pleasure is produced by the repetition, the enjoyment is the product of the event is early, everything breaks loose at once.
The pleasure of the text is the euphoria, satisfaction, and enjoyment is the shock; enjoyment in the subject loses the consistency of his ego. If you can not hide the pleasure and dry up the sources of enjoyment, this is because it is unspeakable, because it occupies the place, however the enjoyment is in-speakable.
To define the pleasure of the text must also define the text, and we can define it as: the space of a rare speech from which every scene is missing, the text is not a dialogue, it's like a small island, shows the asocial nature of pleasure. At the scene of the text the reader encounters himself and his thoughts, he encounters the language in its founding moment and not imposed.
Barthes also implements a search for what is around the work, to the text. The text should give the test to be desired, this test is the writing, which defines it as: the science of the pleasures of language. It also analyzes the desire to read according to their own preferences, dislikes and motivations associated with this activity.
Following its analysis can be groped the reconstruction of a typology of the pleasures of reading. Firstly there is the fetishist who will agree with the text cut, with the splitting up of quotations, with the pleasure of the word. The obsessive would have the pleasure of the letter, of the languages \u200b\u200bout of phase, the meta-languages. The paranoid consume or produce texts winding, as stories developed reasoning, restrictions secret. The hysteric is one who takes the text at face value, which comes into play without content, which is no longer the subject of any critical examination. Apply
also his investigation of signs and literature with this brings to light the fact that the writer is suffering from the effects of his writing, as it is dragged by a current, which moves and turns. So the language of novels, poems reveals itself through the desire that he writes is owned and ends thrown on the scene of the page as a cuttlefish bone on the beach.